Here we are after a year of thread and I still don't get the connection. To me, Karsh and Hurrell did things quite differently. I've had long conversations with one
of Hurrell's longtime assistants, and we have a big Hurrell print in our family collection. A lot of pencil smudge on the negatives was involved. Karsh, on the other hand, tended to render some very crisp prints with hard lighting if the subject was appropriate for that. I don't see much resemblance at all.
Bookmarks