Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: Photoshop CS6 vs. Photoshop CS3/CS4

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Forest Grove, Ore.
    Posts
    4,679

    Re: Photoshop CS6 vs. Photoshop CS3/CS4

    Is the noise reduction capability "in" Photoshop actually part of ACR?

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Hudson Valley, NY
    Posts
    1,692

    Re: Photoshop CS6 vs. Photoshop CS3/CS4

    Technically no. Once you are in Photoshop, then ACR is no longer part of the equation (unless you opened the image (from ACR or Lightroom) in Photoshop as a "smart Object"). It's possible that they use the same noise reduction algorithms in both ACR and Photoshop, but it is extremely rare for me to have a noise issue, and so I really don't have much knowledge about the noise reduction functions.

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Forest Grove, Ore.
    Posts
    4,679

    Re: Photoshop CS6 vs. Photoshop CS3/CS4

    Quote Originally Posted by Oren Grad View Post
    Photoshop and Lightroom are different animals - to oversimplify, one is a heavy-duty editor, while the other is a fancy catalog which happens to have a less-powerful editor built in. I'm not interested in Lightroom's catalog functions, at all, and I'm not interested in having to wrestle with them just to get access to ACR. It doesn't matter to me that the editor functions added to Photoshop since CS3 don't add much of value to me - I'd still rather use a Photoshop-type program. If and when CS6 breaks and takes ACR down with it, I'll probably go to a freestanding raw converter plus a separate editor (for example, Raw Therapee plus PictureWindow Pro) rather than adopting Lightroom. YMMV.
    I know that for my camera, there are 3rd party converters (e.g. RPP) not from the original manufacturer that do a better job of conversion than ACR.

  4. #14

    Re: Photoshop CS6 vs. Photoshop CS3/CS4

    I run both 5.5 and 6.
    Older versions will not make use of more ram. That speeds up my process a lot. But newer versions will not run some of my plugins such as Pictocolor's "In Camera"
    The content aware keeps getting better and there is a significant improvement from 5-6
    Grant

  5. #15
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    8,649

    Re: Photoshop CS6 vs. Photoshop CS3/CS4

    Quote Originally Posted by neil poulsen View Post
    I know that for my camera, there are 3rd party converters (e.g. RPP) not from the original manufacturer that do a better job of conversion than ACR.
    Exactly. The ACR/PS workflow is very convenient, but if and when the time comes, there should be other good options available.

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    398

    Re: Photoshop CS6 vs. Photoshop CS3/CS4

    Quote Originally Posted by Adamphotoman View Post
    I run both 5.5 and 6.
    Older versions will not make use of more ram. That speeds up my process a lot. ...
    Make a RAM Drive (18+Gb)out of your free memory above 6-8Gb and make CS-3 use that RAM Drive as a scratch disk. You might be surprised with the speed it gains

Similar Threads

  1. Photoshop CS5 for MAC
    By sanking in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 10-Dec-2010, 16:42
  2. Anyone using an SSD to run Photoshop?
    By Ron Marshall in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 15-Sep-2009, 14:24
  3. I need a new photoshop??????????
    By ignatiusjk in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 24-Jul-2009, 14:01
  4. Photoshop CS4 for Mac
    By Bob McCarthy in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 8-Apr-2008, 09:34
  5. Do you really NEED Photoshop?
    By Ed Eubanks in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 12-Oct-2004, 10:43

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •