Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Which Graphic?

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    21

    Which Graphic?

    Hi everyone.

    After much research, I think I have decided to start my large format field photography with a 4x5 Graphic. The question is...which one?

    I've read that much about them by so many different people that I think I have just confused myself. It seems there are four varieties, being the Crown, Speed, Super and Super Speed. (Please correct me if I'm wrong).

    Some people appear to like the Crown because it is light and can take wide angle lenses, but others don't like its limited movements and non-revolving back.

    So, my question is, if I'm prepared to accept that 90mm is the widest lens I'm going to use, and don't mind carrying a little extra weight, is the Super or Super Speed a better camera to buy due to it's more substantial prime movements and ability to rotate the Graflok back for vertical shots?

    Are there any more major pros and cons that I have missed?

    Thanks, Travis.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    1,798

    Which Graphic?

    They all have limited movements. It's more have less limited then having alot of movements.

    What is the intended use for the camera? What lens range? 90mm to what?

    To a certain point everybody suggests these cameras for a cheap entry into LF. With everybody suggesting them they aren't that cheap anymore. I don't know what current prices for Supers are but they used to carry a premiumn.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    san jose, ca
    Posts
    150

    Which Graphic?

    Your tripod has a feature that lets you turn any horizontal format into a vertical one. Try it.

    Movements? For field photography? Are you doing architecture? Movements are over rated for 95% of the work you'll do.

    The reasons for buying a Speed or Crown is ease of use, portability, maximum versatility concerning lens and film formats, and being totally bulletproof. If your needs extend beyond this, find the money for another camera, a Horseman or Linhof or whatever.

    tim in san jose

    2x3 Speed - 2x3 Crown - 3x4 Speed - 4x5 Speed - 3x4 Kalart Press

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Harbor City, California
    Posts
    1,753

    Which Graphic?

    The only differences between the Super Graphic and the Super Speed Graphic are the nameplate and the shutter. The Super Speed had a super fast shutter which, alas, turned out to have suicidal tendencies after long use. If you can buy either one as a "body only", that's good. Most lenses that were originally supplied with the Supers didn't have a large enough image circle to permit much, if any, use of the movements which are the factor that makes toting around the extra weight worthwhile. There are lots of appropriate lenses available and quite a few of them will fit inside the camera when closed.



    These are rugged cameras. They make the most sense for someone who intends to take them over rough terrain to take landscape views which seldom require movements beyond what the Supers offer.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    San Joaquin Valley, California
    Posts
    6,641

    Which Graphic?

    Travis,

    There is a tripod socket on the side as well as the bottom of most graphics. verticles and horizontals are no problem even without a rotating back.

    FWIW, I think Speed and Crown Graphics really shine at doing what they were designed for: handheld large format photography. I think they are also an excellent choice for other photographic endeavors as well. especially portraits.

    IMHO, if you are just starting out the main difference you'll notice between the Speeds and the Crown(and Super Speed) is that the Speeders(except for the Super) have a focal plane shutter allowing you to use barrel lenses. If that is a feature you want then the field narrows. If not, the Crowns and the Super Speed will save a bit of wieght and bulk. The Crown Special and Super Speed are also have top mounted range finder many like, but you'll need cams specific for each of the lenses you want to use. I see it as a hassle and prefer to use the sportsfinder---if it was good enough for the great Weegee...

    Another feature that might interest you is the graflock back. My Graphics all have spring backs but if you get one with a graflock back there seems to be no end to the attachments you can use(even a graflarger!) Pretty cool, but the models with spring backs are certainly usable if not as desireable.

    Oh, and about those limited movements: One nice thing about starting out with a Graphic is you won't miss them (since you've never had them to begin with!)

    If you want a Graphic with a heap of movements, get a Graphic View 1 or 2 monorail.

    Being that Graphics are all going to be old, and are all basically the same design for that matter, I think you'll find that the most important consideration is condition. Are the bellows good? Does eveything work as it should? (Remember press cameras don't really get babied like one thats seen time in a studio---lots of Graphics I've seen were "rode hard and put away wet.") If so, it really doesn't matter which model, just enjoy whatever features your chosen camera was born with and take lots of pictures.

    Good Luck!
    I steal time at 1/125th of a second, so I don't consider my photography to be Fine Art as much as it is petty larceny.

  6. #6

    Which Graphic?

    Of all the models I've owned, my favorite would be the Super model, but I really enjoy the Crowns as well, and they are cheaper. Right now I have a couple of beaters that I picked up for next to nothing, and although they don't look great, they are in very good useable condition and to tell the truth I prefer them that way. As an initial entry, no matter which way you go, I say stay under $300 with lens, only because of the lack of back movements, and the relative smaller front movements over a more typical LF camera. Don't expect to get the whole LF experience with cameras that don't have back movements, which I feel is a major part of the larger format. What you will experience will be the routine of shooting slower, carrying more bulk, especially film holders if you go that way, requires handheld metering, zone placements for B&W, larger developing equipment for at home processing and good eyes for a poor ground glass. In fact, a better GG makes the experience more enjoyable. Depending on the lens, and if you go with something that was normal on the camera, you'll need some push on adapters for filters. In the end I'd spend my money on a nice lens that can be used on any camera, and I would not suggest a 90mm as a starter, just in case you might be thinking along those lines, although you didn't say that. After shooting the Graphics, I would suggest to anyone looking to try LF, to think about a Tachihara or Shen Hao as a true first LF camera. The Graphics to me are intended to be used for just what they were in their days, handheld cameras. It's not that they can't take nice landscape pictures on a tripod, in fact for a landscape camera which does not need alot of movements they are rather decent being reasonably light and fast to set up, but when you get to pointing them down or up and going for a perspective correction, you wind up short. Buy cheap, get a decent lens with larger aperture for a dim GG, 4, 5 or 6 film holders and light meter and try it. Either you'll find the slower pace and larger film territroy up your alley or we'll see another Graphic up for sale. All you can do is try. Btw, I prefer the side mounted Kalarts over the top mounted rangefinders which take cams, except for the Super model.

  7. #7
    Ted Harris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    3,484

    Which Graphic?

    I'm gonna be the naysayer here. If you can get one cheap cheap, and that means under $300 then maybe otherwise the right Graphic is something else. Something like a Tachihara or other 'entry level' wood field that is somewhat newer than any Graphic, that has more movements and more importantly will take a wider range of lenses.



    I started my phot6ographic career with a shiny new Speed Graphic in 1954 and it was great then for what ai used it for but I would not recommend it as an entry to the LF world today. There are just too many options that give you more. Just the other side and one man's opinion.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    3

    Which Graphic?

    As a beginner you are unlikely to find your perfect camera on the first try, so it probably makes sense to buy something modest and flog the heck out of it until you know exactly what you need in an LF camera. I would propose that a Speed Graphic with a spring back would keep you well entertained for a long while. It will take any 4x5 holder as well as Polaroid 545. They trade much cheaper than the more desirable models and you may even find one for peanuts at a yard sale, flea market, etc.

    The Ektar on mine has really creamy bokeh, by the way. Rangefinder is dead on also.

    If movements and/or seamless lens interchangeablity are important to you then it would make sense to just skip the press camera and go right to a true view camera.

    Just my experience, yours may differ.

    Jon

  9. #9

    Which Graphic?

    Hi Travis,

    Lots of on-the-mark advise. Especially from John and Wayne. (They just write more). Here's my $0.02

    I started out learning LF with the 4x5 Crown Graphic about 3 years ago. Got some great 20 sq. in. negs and some crappy 20 sq. in. negs, but with more information. You'll learn a lot and fast too. I still use the the beast and love it. I recently bought a Burke & James 4x5 wood view tailboard camera. (BTW-One of these cost less than a Crown - usually). I've made my own adapter to mount lens/lensboard from the Graphic to the B & J. Looks funky but it works fine. I'm now learning about the movements possible on a full view camera. Amazing - now I'm getting 20 sq. in. negs with perspective control, more information AND crappy too.

    "If you're not making mistakes, you're not learning anything."

    You may quote me.

    Good luck. ~)

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    9,344

    Which Graphic?

    Just hang out on eBay until a clean Crown comes along. $200 with a good lens if you're patient. I prefer the top rangefinder ones as they are newer than the side mounted ones.

    A good strategy is to buy two identical cameras - you can swap out the parts and build one nice camera, and use the "beater" for rainy days, experiments, or selling for parts. Many people "part-out" the cameras - making double the money by re-selling just one part at a time.

    The Crown can be stripped, patched, and painted, which can make for an attractive little field camera. I've done two so far. And another nice thing is that you can fold them up with everything from a 75/6.8 Grandagon to a 150mm Sironar...

    A Tachi or Shen Hao isn't any sturdier, they only have more movements (and they look nicer, IMHO).

Similar Threads

  1. Graphic View I , Graphic View II, Grover 4x5
    By Les Alvis in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 9-Nov-2005, 12:05
  2. Super Graphic lensboards the same as Speed Graphic?
    By Robert Meier in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 26-May-2000, 20:35
  3. Top R.F. Graphic cams
    By M. in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 16-Jan-2000, 13:13
  4. Should I Get a 4x5 S. Graphic for 6x7 ?
    By George Nedleman in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 31-Oct-1998, 20:56
  5. Graphic View II
    By George_9 in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 7-Oct-1997, 04:40

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •