Page 283 of 843 FirstFirst ... 183233273281282283284285293333383783 ... LastLast
Results 2,821 to 2,830 of 8425

Thread: MF (6x4.5,6x6,6x7,6x9,6x12) B&W film images sharing

  1. #2821

    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    218

    Re: MF (6x4.5,6x6,6x7,6x9,6x12) B&W film images sharing

    500cm/250mm FP4, PyroHD semi

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	img528.jpg 
Views:	36 
Size:	169.0 KB 
ID:	162625

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	img530.jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	237.6 KB 
ID:	162626

  2. #2822

    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    France
    Posts
    105

    Re: MF (6x4.5,6x6,6x7,6x9,6x12) B&W film images sharing

    Quote Originally Posted by ndwgolf View Post





    A few of my 6 x6...........meet Yuki U

    Very beautiful B&W, attractive photography....I like very much the second
    I am subjected to a single thing, the freedom

  3. #2823

    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    688

    Re: MF (6x4.5,6x6,6x7,6x9,6x12) B&W film images sharing

    When I discovered that XP2 could be processed in B&W chemicals (I still get people who assure me this isn't possible) with very fine grain I bought an awful lot of it for the freezer. I have recently begun to experiment with abusing it in the ways that standard silver halide films can be pushed and pulled, just to see if it stands up to it. So for a starting point I exposed a roll at EI 200, and cut the processing time in half, and wandered about the house taking photos of the relatively dark interior with a bright window in the frame. I just wanted to see if I could get a reasonable image in both areas. This is the kind of thing I got:


    Experiments in Pull Processing 1 by chrism229, on Flickr

    On scanning this negative the histogram was showing it 1-2 stops underexposed, so I should try again at EI 100, or maybe just a bit longer in the developer. The other thing I'd like to do is find out of pushing it is possible without excessive grain. I know that XP2 goes very grainy in Diafine and in Qualls' monobath and I suspect I'll find I can get one stop but probably not two extra out of it before it gets too crunchy, but you don't know unless you try!

  4. #2824

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    1,457

    Re: MF (6x4.5,6x6,6x7,6x9,6x12) B&W film images sharing

    Chrism, in your wandering around the house and film experiments, include some pictures your other "casual" audiophile gear. This sure looks like a turntable, but the two record cleaning brush/sponges would normally be found next to a record cleaning machine, which then wouldn't have a tone arm. Puzzling! (You are probably aware that hidden among us photo types, there are also a bunch of music lovers ...)

  5. #2825
    Barry Kirsten's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Brookfield, Vic., Aust.
    Posts
    536

    Re: MF (6x4.5,6x6,6x7,6x9,6x12) B&W film images sharing

    +1

  6. #2826

    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    688

    Re: MF (6x4.5,6x6,6x7,6x9,6x12) B&W film images sharing

    Peter,
    I thought it might confuse people! It's a Loricraft record cleaning machine. I'd previously used a Nitty Gritty and a VPI, but this beats them hollow. A lot of old vinyl can sound like new after the crud is removed. Other stuff? Well....


    Reference by chrism229, on Flickr

  7. #2827

    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    03082
    Posts
    515

    Re: MF (6x4.5,6x6,6x7,6x9,6x12) B&W film images sharing

    Hi Chris,

    Just curious, have you tried C-41? How were the results? Nice audio hardware BTW.

  8. #2828

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    1,457

    Re: MF (6x4.5,6x6,6x7,6x9,6x12) B&W film images sharing

    Chrism, I actually like your "Reference" turntable both as a photograph as well as a TT! Nice job.

  9. #2829

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Marietta, GA
    Posts
    333

    Re: MF (6x4.5,6x6,6x7,6x9,6x12) B&W film images sharing

    Quote Originally Posted by chrism View Post
    Peter,
    I thought it might confuse people! It's a Loricraft record cleaning machine. I'd previously used a Nitty Gritty and a VPI, but this beats them hollow.
    Interesting. A record cleaning machine is on my list. I do it by hand now and wonder if I could do better. Thanks.

  10. #2830

    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    688

    Re: MF (6x4.5,6x6,6x7,6x9,6x12) B&W film images sharing

    Quote Originally Posted by Old_Dick View Post
    Hi Chris,

    Just curious, have you tried C-41? How were the results? Nice audio hardware BTW.
    On XP2? Yes, a couple of times I've thrown a roll in with some colour film if I had one of the latter to process. That gives incredibly smooth results, to the point that many B&W film shooters don't like it:

    Tea by chrism229, on Flickr

    But to have just a little grain is nice, and to be able to develop the film quickly and cheaply with B&W chemicals is also an advantage. I'm not claiming it's for everyone, but since I happen to have a lot of it I might as well explore what it can be made to do.

Similar Threads

  1. MF (6x4.5 to 6x12) COLOR image sharing
    By richardman in forum Image Sharing (Everything Else) & Discussion
    Replies: 1465
    Last Post: 9-Mar-2024, 16:36
  2. Cutting a 4x5 film holder slide cover for two panoramic images on one sheet of film?
    By l2oBiN in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 29-May-2021, 04:50
  3. Stitching Several 6x12 Images
    By Richard Wasserman in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 9-May-2015, 06:29
  4. Sharing LF images in full resolution/Stitching
    By Ed Richards in forum Image Sharing (LF) & Discussion
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 7-Sep-2014, 23:29

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •