EKTAR 100 Reciprocity Table?

[Regular Rod]

Please can some kind soul point me in the right direction for an EKTAR 100 Reciprocity Table?

Thank you

RR

[Sevo]

None known, as far as I can make out - the data sheet from Kodak merely states:
"No filter correction or exposure compensation is required
for exposures from 1⁄10,000 second to 1 second. For
critical applications with longer exposure times, make tests
under your conditions."

[Regular Rod]

None known, as far as I can make out - the data sheet from Kodak merely states:
"No filter correction or exposure compensation is required
for exposures from 1⁄10,000 second to 1 second. For
critical applications with longer exposure times, make tests
under your conditions."

Yes I read that when I downloaded the pdf. Maybe if Kodak sent me a lot of boxes of film and would pay for the processing I could do their work for them. ILFORD provides all this information in their documentation on an easy to use graph. Different cultures when it comes to customer care I suppose.

I was hoping to find someone had actually made a table or graph and was prepared to share it.

RR

[vinny]

https://www.google.com/search?q=EKTA...ient=firefox-a

[Sevo]

https://www.google.com/search?q=EKTA...ient=firefox-a

Pretty high up among the results that turns up: http://www.apug.org/forums/viewpost.php?p=722024

[Regular Rod]

Pretty high up among the results that turns up: http://www.apug.org/forums/viewpost.php?p=722024

When I first started to try and find a table or chart for EKTAR 100 Reciprocity failure, naturally I did the Google searches and read these threads. The lack of results led me to try asking the members on here to see if anyone had anything based on actual findings.

What I'm after is a table based on results. The estimated figures in that post above are okay for a jumping off point if the film and processing is free of cost. The poster, as far as I can tell didn't come back on the thread with the actual results. All we have is that table based on multiplying the meter reading by 1.3!
Not quite a results based table or chart...

RR