John, thank you very much for your contribution- much to think about there-
I don't expect to be able to do much more than get lucky, as a best case scenario. Although I'll be visiting Connecticut for only a couple of days, I'm in the general area for quite a bit longer, and with a little more luck, I might get to see the complete cycle. I'm in New York now, and there is a lot of tinged green around.
I take your point about the magnification- if I were to be serious about making a lot of pictures of the Fall, I might have travelled with a more sensible, smaller camera. My camera is larger than normal, and it doesn't even get unpacked unless there's some obvious inspiration. I'm not really set up for hiking with it at the moment, so I have an idea about what types of shot might be possible or achievable, and none of them will be far from the road.
Large format, particularly the larger of the large formats, imposes restrictions on the type of shot it's possible to make easily, and I suppose that finding a longish view would be playing to its strengths, especially taking your point about wind into consideration. I too am not so big a fan of movement in leaves, unless, I suppose, you can figure out how to make that the picture...
I don't expect to be doing anything more than playing a tourist with an unfeasibly large camera, and I wouldn't expect to do better than those who have a far more intimate and local knowledge of an area. In addition, as I've mentioned elsewhere, I'm not a landscaper...
You have come closest to addressing the choice of film question, and I suppose I can infer that of the three colour films I mentioned, that you might recommend the faster one?
Nathan, thanks again for your detailed knowledge- I'll be better equipped to know what to look out for now-
As I said, I'm hoping to get lucky, but luck favours the prepared, and I'm feeling a bit more lucky now...
Bookmarks