Hello all,
well, after researching my little heart out on LF macro, I am left with a few questions. To put them in context, here are my aims and current gear:
- want to document the natural beauty of our surrounds in detail - features of our native plants: leaves, flowers, fallen bark (stunning at the right time of year), and possibly do some art reproduction etc.,
- would love to shoot 1:1 and greater magnification from time to time but most "close" shots will probably be around 1:2 to 1:3 mag (ie. a 15" wide spread of fallen bark etc.), close-ups of my sleeping children's faces etc.,
- have the following lenses: Schneider 72XL, Nikkor SW 90/4.5, Schneider APO 150/5.6, Schneider 210/5.6 and Nikkor M 300/9,
- my camera is the (absolutely beautiful) Chamonix 045F-1 (4x5 with front focus adjust only)
Firstly - if I am going to attempt some 1:1 'fine art' shooting, just how difficult will it be with my setup (and a macro lens)? I ask this as I understand it can be very difficult to achieve focus with only a front focus adjust. The majority of my subjects will be immoveable.
Secondly, is it likely the Nikkor AM-ED 120 will suit my purposes? I understand that it won't give me 4x5 coverage at infinity, but will only be used for closer work.
As an alternative, would I be *that* much better off to spend more and buy a Schneider 120/5.6 Makro-Symmar with a bigger circle and presumably an overall better macro lens than the Nikkor. As a side note, I would prefer to spend more up-front than buy something that will be regrettably limiting for all time thereafter.
Is my assumption correct that none of my existing glass will give me decent quality at 1:1 or thereabouts? I can of course do my own experiments but with no dedicated macro with which to compare, it's unlikely to be conclusive. (...and I have to confess that I'm always after justification to buy new glass!!).
Any answers or suggestions will be gratefully received!
Cheers and thank-you,
David (Sydney)
Bookmarks