Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Premo, Poco ?

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,135

    Premo, Poco ?

    Recently acquired another camera, I was hoping it was a full plate but it's a 5x7.
    I'm having a devil of a time trying to ID this camera, the nameplate seems to
    have been attached some other way rather than the usual tiny brads and is lost to time.
    Scouring Cameraeccentric and Peircevauble sites especially the latter, it seems to to me that
    it's either a Premo, or possibly a Poco.
    The only thing that's flummoxing me is that the rear tilt lock is not center or at the
    bottom as the catalogs illustrate but it's towards the top and only on one side.

    Anyone own the same camera that can tentatively ID mine ?
    How was the name plate attached ?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_2864_2.jpg 
Views:	27 
Size:	40.6 KB 
ID:	100287

  2. #2
    Tin Can's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    22,505

    Re: Premo, Poco ?

    More pictures please.
    Tin Can

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    6,254

    Re: Premo, Poco ?

    Poco Cycle.
    I have the 8x10" version.
    No name on mine as the bellows/front standard were long gone. I have adopted a standard Graflex front standard which fits the rail.
    You (and I) have the long focus model. Yours is the 2 stage extension with metal - mine is the single mahogany framework extension.
    I have never found a good catalogue (there are excellent Premo/ROC available)from the other Rochester organisation which seems to have changed names and models every year - so my labelling as a Poco is based on rather poor advert sketches.
    Almost all these had a name plate on the base of the front standard - look for 2 screws holes there!
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails poco8x10 001.jpg   poco8x10 002.jpg  

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,135

    Re: Premo, Poco ?

    Steven, Thanks for the ID, Peircevauble has some really awesome ROC catalogs including the Premo/Poco ones.
    Nothing in the catalogs matched because of the unique rear tilt placement knob.
    I went thru them all and was about to trawl thru Google books to if there were any ads in the old photography publications.
    Odd thing about the name plate is that the front standard has no holes at all, it's pristine.
    It must have been attached some other way. Another oddity is that the GG is reversed, the matte side facing out,
    this is the same way the GG was installed on my Century Grand.

    Randy - here's some of the camera porn you wanted

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_2863.jpg 
Views:	22 
Size:	34.8 KB 
ID:	100328 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_2865_2.jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	26.5 KB 
ID:	100329 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_2866_2.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	32.7 KB 
ID:	100330

  5. #5
    Jon Shiu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Mendocino, California
    Posts
    1,317

    Re: Premo, Poco ?

    I think some people reversed the ground glass in an effort compensate for the focus registration being out of place on film vs plate holders. Of course, this is a very imprecise way of calibrating the focus plane.

    Jon

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim C. View Post
    Steven, Thanks for the ID, Peircevauble has some really awesome ROC catalogs including the Premo/Poco ones.
    Nothing in the catalogs matched because of the unique rear tilt placement knob.
    I went thru them all and was about to trawl thru Google books to if there were any ads in the old photography publications.
    Odd thing about the name plate is that the front standard has no holes at all, it's pristine.
    It must have been attached some other way. Another oddity is that the GG is reversed, the matte side facing out,
    this is the same way the GG was installed on my Century Grand.

    Randy - here's some of the camera porn you wanted

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_2863.jpg 
Views:	22 
Size:	34.8 KB 
ID:	100328 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_2865_2.jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	26.5 KB 
ID:	100329 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_2866_2.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	32.7 KB 
ID:	100330
    my black and white photos of the Mendocino Coast: jonshiu.zenfolio.com

  6. #6
    Tin Can's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    22,505

    Re: Premo, Poco ?

    Thanks for the images and data points. I have 2 very nice Premo kits, 4x5 and 5x7.

    My 4x5 is missing the name plate also and does have the 2 holes.

    These cameras are usable jewels, so well made and mine look barely touched. The 5x7 was sold as a 9 of 10 but the seller packed it in hard Styrofoam and it suffered impact shipping damage. The only time out of 100's of long distance transactions where I did ask for a damage reduction. I never bicker or dicker, but it was packed poorly. I was sad the gem was damaged after a 100 years.

    I will look for an 8x10 to match.

    Have fun!
    Tin Can

  7. #7
    Tin Can's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    22,505

    Re: Premo, Poco ?

    Perhaps Steven knows, my 4x5 looks untouched, the GG is matte to the rear and the kit came with original plate holder, including plates and a Premo film pack holder.

    I think I have read some cameras came with the GG matte to the rear.

    My 5x7 lost the OE GG in shipping along with other damage.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jon Shiu View Post
    I think some people reversed the ground glass in an effort compensate for the focus registration being out of place on film vs plate holders. Of course, this is a very imprecise way of calibrating the focus plane.

    Jon
    Tin Can

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,135

    Re: Premo, Poco ?

    Randy, it's a shame that your Premo 5x7 was damaged in shipping, but we're taliking about Poco's in this thread
    Some of these cameras can be as confusing as Graflex's.

  9. #9
    Tin Can's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    22,505

    Re: Premo, Poco ?

    Sorry, I don't know the difference, they look very much alike.


    Quote Originally Posted by Jim C. View Post
    Randy, it's a shame that your Premo 5x7 was damaged in shipping, but we're taliking about Poco's in this thread
    Some of these cameras can be as confusing as Graflex's.
    Tin Can

Similar Threads

  1. cycle poco no 5 still usable?
    By stehei in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 19-Jun-2011, 08:24
  2. Poco Rem 4x5
    By Jerry Cole in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 31-May-2002, 10:41

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •