Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: v11 deardorff or chamoix 16x20 camera?

  1. #11

    Re: v11 deardorff or chamoix 16x20 camera?

    I have a 4x5 and 8x10 Chamonix and love the quality, craftsmanship, ease of use, light weight, and price of their cameras. I am now preparing to buy their 16x20 with a 14x17 reducing back for the very reason you are considering their 16x20 with an 11x14 back. You can't go wrong with Chamonix. Hugo Zhang is great to work with, and Chamonix ships immediately.

  2. #12
    Tin Can's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    22,389

    Re: v11 deardorff or chamoix 16x20 camera?

    But, I don't play the Lottery!

    lol

    Quote Originally Posted by Rob Vinnedge View Post
    I have a 4x5 and 8x10 Chamonix and love the quality, craftsmanship, ease of use, light weight, and price of their cameras. I am now preparing to buy their 16x20 with a 14x17 reducing back for the very reason you are considering their 16x20 with an 11x14 back. You can't go wrong with Chamonix. Hugo Zhang is great to work with, and Chamonix ships immediately.
    Tin Can

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    377

    Re: v11 deardorff or chamoix 16x20 camera?

    If you enjoy the Deardorff "feel" I echo the sentiment that it is a nice idea to "upsize" from a V8 to a V11. That said I have found that my V11 is really too big and heavy for the kind of things that I used my 8x10 for so it isn't exactly a straight swap. Many of the newer 11x14s (Chamonix springs to mind) are considerably lighter so might be a better bet if you are wanting to be at all portable. They might even end up cheaper due to the scarceness of V11s.......

    V11s do use the same lens boards as the V8, or at least mine does.

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    San Joaquin Valley, California
    Posts
    9,599

    Re: v11 deardorff or chamoix 16x20 camera?

    What an envy-able problem to have!
    I'd be no help, I'm afraid, but when I think of prints from those negatives I'm thinking "contacts" and 11x14 is the darn near perfect big head format.
    So if you get the 16x20 by all means consider getting a reducing back for it.
    My 2-cents (and worth exactly what ya paid for it! )
    "I would feel more optimistic about a bright future for man if he spent less time proving that he can outwit Nature and more time tasting her sweetness and respecting her seniority"---EB White

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    New Berlin, Wi
    Posts
    1,354

    Re: v11 deardorff or chamoix 16x20 camera?

    I have had Deardorffs and nownhave an 11x14 and 8x10 Chamonix. I'm a woodworker and make very fancy, precise pool,cues for a living. If you think Deardorffs are works of art, you should know that the Cahamonix blows them away. My new 8x10 is almost the finest wooden object I've ever seen. My 11x14 kit is lighter than my 4x5 Arca kit, you should try to see a Cham in person...Evan Clarke

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    4

    Re: v11 deardorff or chamoix 16x20 camera?

    Have you considered a Wisner 16x20? Long bellows draw and while not a lightweight good for studio and manageable in the field with some muscle and not too far to go from the truck.

  7. #17
    Scott Davis
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    1,875

    Re: v11 deardorff or chamoix 16x20 camera?

    I have a Canham 14x17 that I do take in the field from time to time. Canhams have their quirks, but I do love the camera overall. What's not to like about a sub- 20 lb. 14x17? It has enough bellows draw to exceed 1:1 macro using a Nikkor 450 M.

  8. #18
    Deardorff Sales and service
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    414

    Re: v11 deardorff or chamoix 16x20 camera?

    This is an interesting thread. One I found myself in 20 years ago. I was shooting my V8 and was just not happy. They were after 8x10 in size and that was not big enough. I found a V11 and thought I was all set. But still not big enough. I had an old early Empire State 14x17. I went to a friend who was a radiologist and he gave me some ugly but working X ray holders. I started shooting. Now everything just got BIG. The camera, Holders, Contact frame etc..............HELP! Then a 8x10 Fotar enlarger came my way. Oh boy. I set it up and enlarged my first 8x10 neg to 20X24. With practice this became my preferred method of making big prints. And all I have to do is lug my V8 like I was doing all along....
    Ken
    Ken Hough Deardorff Refinisher since 1982
    Deardorff Factory refinisher / remanufacturer 1982-88
    Deardorff Factory Historian 82-88
    Deardorff Cameras on Facebook
    www.deardorffcameras.0catch.com

Similar Threads

  1. does anybody know the lens board dimensions of the 16x20 chamoix view camera
    By phillip2446 in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 18-May-2013, 23:22
  2. Digital Camera or MF Camera for Portability and 16X20" prints?
    By Findingmyway4ever in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 113
    Last Post: 29-Apr-2012, 17:11

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •