Drew, cats are one of the few animals capable to watch TV like we, humans, do. I.e. they capable of seeing a scene on the screen and perceive it as a reality you're in. No wonder your cat ignores...
Type: Posts; User: prendt; Keyword(s):
Drew, cats are one of the few animals capable to watch TV like we, humans, do. I.e. they capable of seeing a scene on the screen and perceive it as a reality you're in. No wonder your cat ignores...
Never mind. It happens even in the best families.
Except that it is not a 6x12 format.
I wasn't aware that Arca Swiss made folding field cameras. Which one do you have in mind?
Good to know, thanks for the clarification.
A crucial question - did you contact the vendor to see what he has to say about the problem? Would be interesting to know his side of the story, me thinks.
When you order bellows you need to specify the minimum pressed dimension you need - the bellows material is often-time chosen accordingly. Sharp folds are no advantage - they can cause pinholes later.
Indeed, modern bellows are often constructed without so called stiffeners. The material is "self supporting". Makes the production easier and cheaper without sacrificing the quality.
Thus speaks a real Master!
I don't see any attacks on moderators there, just a legitimate tendency to touch problems where they are.
Recently I followed the thread of Upcoming changes for the FS/WTB sub-forum.
Remember the promise in it?
"You may post your feedback about these proposed changes in this thread for the next 10...
+1, Well said koh303.
Just plainly curious - do you have any LF outfit?
I appreciate your positive attitude in the matter. If only all could say the same!
Thank you for the medicine, everything will do in the time of doubts and misery...
Now you got me really confused - don't know anymore what is better, digital or analogue? When even masters can't say what am I suppose to believe? Eh, what misery!
I agree. That's why I never take part in those fights. To watch it it too is rarely interesting without yawns.
Yeah, but to say sometimes photos are just good photos doesn't say much to speak about. There must be more underlying.
It seems to me you're just after reasoning you could use in your "constant fighting" at the school. Am I mistaken? If pictures don't say anything they are just boring pictures. How about that?
After all the pages written about it I wish somebody said it clearly (and proved it!) what is really better in the couple digital - analogue. Otherwise it's just beating the poor dead horse all the...
Welcome Alan Klein! You will find a lot in the LF forum!
I agree with you. As the "first scientific test in the history" one would expect something more scientific than this amateurish kind of test. Will go down well with some people though.
Well, I would not be so quick to discard the Fresnel issue with Chamonix, after all it was a defect. If I remember correctly, GPS - one of our members, started about this issue a good thread years...
I know, but just imagine the poor new guy asking a question and having it disappeared into the Lounge (where you cannot even go without first logging in) with no word of explanation. The OP just...
I agree. What is more, the newcomers must be terribly confused to find long and many discussions of things now outlawed in the main forum, not moved to the Lounge, only to find the hard way that...
A polite explanation goes a longer way than overreacting. Your servant,truly.
Not always, I agree. Not in this case, I add. Your servant, truly.
What underlying hostility are you speaking about? On who's side? I just got deleted posts when I doubted about MF scanner scanning 4x5 image twice and stitching the results. Do you think trying to...
That's my understanding too. See the new thread - Scanning & stitching troubles. Where does it belong and why? The scanner is not 4x5 size.
How about if the scanner doesn't take 4x5 size film. Will it be moved to the Lounge if it draws a complaint? Can it be discussed on the main forum outside the Lounge then? Please clarify.
Thank you for the reference.
Well, Kirk Gittings, the former moderator, sees it quite differently: "I don't think our discussions will change anything. This forum is not a democracy-but that is another question." (LF...
Forgive your servant another question - when was this ever announced prior to this post? It's just that I don't remember seeing it anywhere.
Thank you for your explanation.
IF you forgive your servant - I'm still confused. Why can you discuss on this forum a small bubble level on your LF camera but not a much bigger roll film holder on...
Sorry, 97 results in fact.
Good for you. If you do a search for "6x7 roll film backs" you get 89 threads where they are discussed. Many threads even have this in their title. They're not in the Lounge though. Hopefully it will...
I'm still confused. And why can you discuss on this forum a small bubble level on your LF camera but not a much bigger roll film holder on the same LF camera?
One who wants to understand.
And why can you discuss on this forum a small bubble level on your LF camera but not a much bigger roll film holder on the same LF camera?
Then why is the thread MPP 6X7 Roll Film Back in the camera& camera accessories subforum? Not to speak about so many other threads discussing MF rollfilm backs out of the Lounge?
What a subversive post you have written! Please, rethink it again.