Re: Manhattan Optical Oddity
From trying it on my 8x10 (it seems to cover), I believe that should be F=16 in.
Re: Manhattan Optical Oddity
It looks like a typical 1880's/'90's landscape lens, similar to the Waterbury and quite a few others, though perhaps a bit longer in focal length. The only thing odd is the restriction of the aperture at the rear.
If you can remove the restrictions at both ends, these make nice soft-focus lenses! Otherwise, it will give a fairly conventional look at smaller apertures. Have fun with it!
Re: Manhattan Optical Oddity
It seems odd that it's fixed aperture. The others I've seen have an aperture wheel usually. maybe this was a low cost offering. And, at 16" FL and a half inch aperture, it's far slower. 16" seems very long for 5x7. Doesn't seem too useful for landscape. maybe the aperture was to improve sharpness for portraiture?
I removed the front aperture - it screws off with the barrel - and it softened up quite a bit. I think I need to remove the mount from the wooden board to get the rear aperture off.
Re: Manhattan Optical Oddity
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fotoguy20d
And, at 16" FL and a half inch aperture, it's far slower. 16" seems very long for 5x7. Doesn't seem too useful for landscape.
ah, people in this day and age.. Books from late 1800s suggested longest possible lenses for landscape work.
Re: Manhattan Optical Oddity
"
Quote:
Books from late 1800s suggested longest possible lenses for landscape work.
"
Now that is something I agree with.
There may have been a split ring in the front and a set of stops which could be placed underneath the ring. I did think about the odd looking rear stop being a set of rings - incorrectly mount at the rear. There is another landscape lens that has additional rear stops (Pulligny adjustable landscape from the 1890's). Eddie has an entertaining video on how it works!