Confusing enlarger coverage - please help
I finally found an 8x10 enlarger (an old Durst Laborator 184) to print my 8x10 glass negs and am having a very confusing problem - any thoughts here would be greatly appreciated.
I am not getting full coverage of the negative and it doesn't look like fall off - it looks like an actual straight edge cropping my negs on all sides, even though the neg is perfectly centered in the carrier.
This enlarger should cover a 12x12 neg and my plates are 7 1/2" x 9 1/4". I have the condensers in the proper position according to the manual and am using a 240 lens.
Anybody know what is going on???
Thanks in advance for any assistance, I am really frustrated and dying to get to work.
Re: Confusing enlarger coverage - please help
Look into the enlarger with the head removed and see if there's a baffle or stage between the lens to bellows to neg stage areas that might be blocking the edges of the light path (place your eye near a corner of the neg stage and look), then turn on enlarger without neg, project onto white paper at the proper focus, and see if you can see a shading near the edges... Try to figure what might be intruding into the light path...
You don't have masking strips in that stage maybe in the way???
Start there...
Steve K
Re: Confusing enlarger coverage - please help
Re: Confusing enlarger coverage - please help
I can't picture how you are doing this. Are you taking the top glass out of the NEGA 205 and setting your glass negative on the bottom glass? Or are you using something different?
Re: Confusing enlarger coverage - please help
Thank you all for your quick responses.
I don't see anything blocking the neg....
There aren't any masking blades inside the head are there??
Yes, I am resting the glass plate on the bottom glass of the carrier.
Such a mystery, I just can't figure it out...
Re: Confusing enlarger coverage - please help
Ok, I've just spoken with the person I bought the enlarger from and there ARE masking blades inside the head - never have seen that before. I guess that's what you were talking about Drew. Anyway, problem solved. Thank you all again for your help, I really appreciate it. Printing tomorrow!
Re: Confusing enlarger coverage - please help
Most "real" LF enlargers have them
Re: Confusing enlarger coverage - please help
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Luis-F-S
Most "real" LF enlargers have them
I wish :(
My Durst 8x10 needs a whole series of masking plates (HOMASKSET) which I have never found, so I use cardboard.
My top of the line Omega D5500s don't have masking blades either :( so I us cardboard.
However, my dinky little Philips 150 does have them :) :)
Re: Confusing enlarger coverage - please help
My Omega F had them, my Durst SM-183 has them, my DeVere 5108 has them as do most of the 504's! The prosumer ones generally don't. L