Re: How about some infrared images
Alberto, that photo is very good. I could never get a result like that with Efke IR 820 Aura, in 4x5". As to the sensitivity, I would try 3 asa, 1,5 asa and 0,75 asa.
I still don't understand very well how this film responds to light. I always get diferent results, using the same exposure index. It's always inconsistent.
The Rollei 400 IR is a much easier film to deal, with incredible sharpness and middle tones, unfortunatelly, it costs the double of Efke's film. Another "problem" with Rollei IR 400 is its extremelly thin base, wich reminds Kodak HIE's base.
Re: How about some infrared images
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Nana Sousa Dias
Alberto, that photo is very good. I could never get a result like that with Efke IR 820 Aura, in 4x5". As to the sensitivity, I would try 3 asa, 1,5 asa and 0,75 asa.
- etc etc ...- .
Yes, great Nana ;)
thanks a lot - I'll start following your advices and I'll show the forum as soon I develop the films
thanks again - I really appreciated
ciao!!
Re: How about some infrared images
My results with Efke 820 Aura have been very good. I have only used 120 roll film but plan to shoot 4x5 this summer. I shot it at ASA 1.6 and use an 89B filter. I would post something here but it is only MF.
Re: How about some infrared images
Same here, 1.5 asa, 89b filter.
Bracketing is for sissies!
Re: How about some infrared images
Quote:
Originally Posted by
vinny
Same here, 1.5 asa, 89b filter.
Bracketing is for sissies!
Well, I use to do triple bracketing, so, I supose that makes me a triple sissy...
Re: How about some infrared images
Re: How about some infrared images
Re: How about some infrared images
Quote:
Originally Posted by
scm
great tones..thanks for sharing
Re: How about some infrared images
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Nana Sousa Dias
Great Shots again Nana!! Particularly like the second
Re: How about some infrared images
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Steve French
Great Shots again Nana!! Particularly like the second
Thanks, Steve.