Was there a sign for you that you weren't (or were) a LF photographer?
Was there a sign for you that you weren't (or were) a LF photographer?
It pains me to sell my Tech Master. I thought I sold it once but the buyer backed out. I'm trying again. And right after I had a first winning bidder on the Master, I bought a Tech V from a local used camera store, out of seller's regret. Fortunately they took it back and refunded my money when I told them that the sale of the Master fell through.
A couple years ago, I sold all my 4x5 lenses, except for a couple.
I've only shot the camera a couple times in the last 2 years. Is that the biggest sign - the low usage means I'm not an LF shooter?
I mostly shoot 35mm, and medium format.
For those that got out of LF, what was the sign for you, that LF wasn't for you?
....Vick
Re: Was there a sign for you that you weren't (or were) a LF photographer?
A camera is a tool, not club. Generally, you'll do your best (or at least come away more satisfied with how you've spent your time) when working with the tools which give you the most pleasure.
I'm not sure usage is a good indicator.
A fly fisherman may only get on a stream a few times a year. A private pilot may actually log only 30 or 40 hours a year. A commercial photographer likely spends the bulk of his time shooting digital cameras and only gets to play with the big ones for his personal use.
That dosen't mean the fisherman or pilot or commercial photographer isn't a real fisherman, pilot, or large format photographer, does it?
Call yourself a photographer and call it good
Re: Was there a sign for you that you weren't (or were) a LF photographer?
I almost never used my LF camera the first year or so after I bought it. Part of the reason for me was that I didn't like the particular camera I bought for my first camera (a somewhat heavy, complex camera). After I replaced it with a lighter, simpler LF camera that I found easier to set up, take down, and carry around I started using that camera occasionally. And as I used it more I became more comfortable with it, which led to using it even more, etc. etc. So if there are things you don't like about your particular camera you could always try replacing it with one that doesn't have the problems you find with your present camera.
OTOH, if you just don't like the whole process of LF photography (loading film, carrying the camera around, using movements, etc.) then I'd suggest just forgetting about LF and stick with what you like. Despite what some here seem to think, using a LF camera isn't a badge of honor or some great achievement that only a select few can attain. Anybody can use a large format camera. The trick is making excellent photographs regardless of the format used to make them.
Re: Was there a sign for you that you weren't (or were) a LF photographer?
I've been getting signs to go off photography altogether lately. In fact I was thinking about this for the past month.
It seems like whenever I stop to photograph something, people and vehicles seem to show up in my scene all of a sudden. Problems I had never experienced before start ruining my photos. A light leak here, a dark slide that slips down blocking part of the negative there... developing problems... quite depressing I have to say.
Re: Was there a sign for you that you weren't (or were) a LF photographer?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Vick Ko
Was there a sign for you that you weren't (or were) a LF photographer?
It pains me to sell my Tech Master. I thought I sold it once but the buyer backed out. I'm trying again. And right after I had a first winning bidder on the Master, I bought a Tech V from a local used camera store, out of seller's regret. Fortunately they took it back and refunded my money when I told them that the sale of the Master fell through.
A couple years ago, I sold all my 4x5 lenses, except for a couple.
I've only shot the camera a couple times in the last 2 years. Is that the biggest sign - the low usage means I'm not an LF shooter?
I mostly shoot 35mm, and medium format.
For those that got out of LF, what was the sign for you, that LF wasn't for you?
....Vick
If you like to make images that only a large negative and movements can accomplish, then you use a large negative and a camera with movements. There is no such thing as a "large format photographer", there are however photographers who use large format cameras because that is the tool that allows them to make the photographs they like making. If you identify yourelf as "a large format photographer" then there is a possibility that another agenda is at work, whether you realise it or not.
Re: Was there a sign for you that you weren't (or were) a LF photographer?
Hi Vick,
I most value a crisp looking scenic on 11x14. 35mm rarely delivers it but when everything falls in place it comes close with a little softness, 6x9 has delivered it on occasion but lately it too has softness. 4x5 always, always comes through.
I took a recent hiatus and shot 35mm and 120, so recently reconfirmed my feelings on this...
Because it delivers the look, easily, I remain committed to 4x5 black and white.
Re: Was there a sign for you that you weren't (or were) a LF photographer?
Last time I quit..it was because a pee stick had an X
so I sold all my stuff.
I've slowly been trying to get back - most based upon a concept of taking portraits with a Linhof Tech 5x7
Re: Was there a sign for you that you weren't (or were) a LF photographer?
Try a lightweight 4x5 with Graflok back and a 6x12cm RFH.
Re: Was there a sign for you that you weren't (or were) a LF photographer?
"How do you know you need to piss?" No, I don't remember what famous painter said that when he was asked by a novice about being an artist. You need it because you really do need it!
I took up large format cameras because a box camera (SLR) could not do what I needed to be done. I wanted more of a scene in focus, and the only device that gives me that is the large format camera. Nothing else. Movements are king. And that large negative? Icing on the cake. The camera is just a much of a paintbrush as is a lens.
Vick, you picked up a LF camera for a reason. What it gear acquisition syndrome? Was it, "_____ used one of these, so me too?"
I think that what you've done that holds you back the most is that you are putting a label on yourself. No more labels! You photograph. To paraphrase Deepak Chopra, "You are a human, photographing."
Re: Was there a sign for you that you weren't (or were) a LF photographer?
I was using my only camera (Rolleiflex) like a view camera -- on a pod, on f/22, on "B", taking landscapes. So when I used a 4x5 for the first time in a photo class, it just seemed right.
Vaughn