Re: Was there a sign for you that you weren't (or were) a LF photographer?
I'm still searching. I recently traded my Deardorff V8 for a Sinar P kit. I lived quite happily with the V8 for several years, but recently, having made many changes in my life, I feel the need for stability and precision. I want to work in a controlled, studio environment, on project - based work. This is all 180 degrees from everything I've ever done. If you don't feel your tools fit, changing them might improve your work.
Re: Was there a sign for you that you weren't (or were) a LF photographer?
I went on view camera hiatus for several years while my children were young. I've come back to using them in the past 5 years because I have more time, and I'm involved with a group that gets me out to photograph once a month. I still use my MF cameras, but for some situations, a view camera is just the better tool.
Peter Gomena
Re: Was there a sign for you that you weren't (or were) a LF photographer?
A) Was there a sign for you that you were a LF photographer?
- After viewing an informal personal "portfolio" of my existing work, a very well known and regarded LF photographer commented that I "had pushed medium format as far as it could go", further suggesting if normal view cameras were insufficient, I should give 11X14 a try.
B) Was there a sign for you that you weren't a LF photographer?
- Looking at and digesting those signs a lot over the past few years: the X-Rays of my abused arthritic knees.
Re: Was there a sign for you that you weren't (or were) a LF photographer?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Vaughn
I was using my only camera (Rolleiflex) like a view camera -- on a pod, on f/22, on "B", taking landscapes.
That pretty much happened with me to, using the MF as if it were a view camera.
Re: Was there a sign for you that you weren't (or were) a LF photographer?
"There is no such thing as a "large format photographer", there are however photographers who use large format cameras because that is the tool that allows them to make the photographs they like making."
"The trick is making excellent photographs regardless of the format used to make them."
To those superb answers I would add: It can be fun to switch from one kind of equipment to another. It can also be instructive. Each approach tends to improve the other.
Re: Was there a sign for you that you weren't (or were) a LF photographer?
A few years ago I stopped to photograph an abandoned farm house. The only camera I had with me was my Mamiya 7 II, a camera that I absolutely love. I was shooting it on a tripod, using slow film, all the things necessary to maximize quality. The distant shots were fine. Nevertheless, when I moved in close, I kept getting frustrated because the Mamiya does not have movements. I would set up the camera, look at the scene and think how I could make it better if I could just use a little front rise or fall. If I had my view camera and the ability to shift, I could square that doorway and the window behind it. After a short while, I gave up with the Mamiya and drove into town to get my view camera. For me, I had learned to see in terms of using a view camera and the creative possibilities offered by using movements. Not having them frustrated me. I now keep my view camera with me in the car.
Re: Was there a sign for you that you weren't (or were) a LF photographer?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ken Lee
"There is no such thing as a "large format photographer", there are however photographers who use large format cameras because that is the tool that allows them to make the photographs they like making."
"The trick is making excellent photographs regardless of the format used to make them."
To those superb answers I would add: It can be fun to switch from one kind of equipment to another. It can also be instructive. Each approach tends to improve the other.
I didn't realise just what a superb job 35mm does until I started using 4x5 and 8x10.
Re: Was there a sign for you that you weren't (or were) a LF photographer?
Ha ha ha ha
The first pee stick put an end to my darkroom. That room became my older boy's bedroom.
The second one came almost 2 years ago. Lots of digi-PS for him, but no LF portraits.
Yeah, I understand.
Vick
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DrTang
Last time I quit..it was because a pee stick had an X
so I sold all my stuff.
I've slowly been trying to get back - most based upon a concept of taking portraits with a Linhof Tech 5x7
Re: Was there a sign for you that you weren't (or were) a LF photographer?
While I understand what is meant, if there is no such thing as a large format photographer, then in follows that there is no such thing as a photographer. They are just labels.
I am a large format photographer who just developed 18 rolls of 120 film...:)
Re: Was there a sign for you that you weren't (or were) a LF photographer?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Vaughn
While I understand what is meant, if there is no such thing as a large format photographer, then in follows that there is no such thing as a photographer. They are just labels.
I am a large format photographer who just developed 18 rolls of 120 film...:)
"They are just labels..." That's my point. "I'm a large format photographer"... what does that mean? Do you take pictures of large formats? "Photographer" isn't a label, but a description the same as "watchmaker" or "surgeon". What I mean is that a photographer uses light to make images. The specific eguipment is subject to the type of images one wishes to make.
When did you ever hear someone say they were a 35mm photographer? Or - God forbid - a small format photographer?