E-6 to C-41: A Transition
Greetings and a thread starter:
I'm looking for suggestions.
After TPI in Fairfield, NJ closed its doors at the beginning of this year, I lost the last available lab in my normal travel area that processed E-6 films.
So now I'm in the process of switching over to C-41 films for most of my photo work that I can still get processed locally. I like the idea of being able to hand deliver and pick-up my work, paying out-of-pocket, without having to resort to mailing and charge-cards.
Now I've always been an E-6 film fan and I have my favorites. Many of them are discontinued but I've managed to stockpile quite a supply so that is not an immediate issue.
The problem is that no matter what C-41 films I've used to date, I simply don't seem to get the same results at sunset and after dark with these films that I get with my favorite transparencies. And yes I've tinkered with all the colors, saturation, histogram, brightness, and other controls that are available to me with my Epson 4990 scanning software.
To now I've tried a lot of different C-41 films including Ektar 100 and Portra VS but still no real comparison to RVP, RDP, RTP, and Ektachrome transparency films I've used extensively for so long. I've also tried cross-processing a few and had some moderate success with CDU II which give me some nice sunset colors.
So, I'll post a few examples later but for now I'd like to hear others' suggestions about their success with C-41 films during those witching hours of sunrise and sunset.
Bob G.
Re: E-6 to C-41: A Transition
Sounds like you like very saturated colors. Kodak Ektar 100 is a good place to start. After scanning (with minimum adjustments in the scanner software) I would then treat your scans in Photoshop or similar software - you should be able to get very close to what you are looking for - there are even actions in Photoshop that allow you to simulate various E-6 looks. I believe Nik software is offering a bunch of those.
Re: E-6 to C-41: A Transition
I guess Taylor (Princeton) is not in your travel area?
More importantly, where are you getting large format C-41 done that you can't get E-6 done? (I can't help with the original question).
Re: E-6 to C-41: A Transition
for not much money you can process E6 at home, all my work is home processed as there is nowhere left locally. The chemicals cost around 20 cents a sheet. Its not a hard process and I've always had great results.
Re: E-6 to C-41: A Transition
Chrome and color neg films are just different. I find myself using both, but for different
kinds of subject matter per hue pallette, contrast range, etc. The saturation peaks of
the dyes ultimately have to somehow wiggle around that orange mask, and there's
an inevitable effect, though improvements in C-41 films have certainly been dramatic
in recent years (unless you preferred the old muddy Vericolor look).
Re: E-6 to C-41: A Transition
Quote:
Originally Posted by
David de Gruyl
I guess Taylor (Princeton) is not in your travel area?
More importantly, where are you getting large format C-41 done that you can't get E-6 done? (I can't help with the original question).
David:
There's a lab in Clifton NJ, Pro-Lab that has been doing my LF C-41 with great results. Very professional.
But they don't do E-6 or B&W and send it out. Same as I could do myself.
Bob G.
Re: E-6 to C-41: A Transition
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Juergen Sattler
Sounds like you like very saturated colors. Kodak Ektar 100 is a good place to start. After scanning (with minimum adjustments in the scanner software) I would then treat your scans in Photoshop or similar software - you should be able to get very close to what you are looking for - there are even actions in Photoshop that allow you to simulate various E-6 looks. I believe Nik software is offering a bunch of those.
Yes I really like the Kodak Ektar 100 and it gives great results during the day. I stocked up on it a few weeks ago.
But so far (at least the few times I tried) it's not a good comparison to E-6 at sunset or after.
Bob G.
Re: E-6 to C-41: A Transition
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Drew Wiley
Chrome and color neg films are just different. I find myself using both, but for different
kinds of subject matter per hue pallette, contrast range, etc. The saturation peaks of
the dyes ultimately have to somehow wiggle around that orange mask, and there's
an inevitable effect, though improvements in C-41 films have certainly been dramatic
in recent years (unless you preferred the old muddy Vericolor look).
Actually I have lots of Vericolor VPS and VPL in stock and I use these regularly for the grainy-muddy look that you suggested.
Sometimes after dark they do well but the graininess intensifies.
Example attached on VPL.
Bob G.
Re: E-6 to C-41: A Transition
Quote:
Originally Posted by
David Higgs
for not much money you can process E6 at home, all my work is home processed as there is nowhere left locally. The chemicals cost around 20 cents a sheet. Its not a hard process and I've always had great results.
Good suggestion and I've thought of that.
Unfortunately after a costly divorce I'm homeless and live with family members. Not my house and I've been reluctant to consider home processing until I retire and invest in my own home. Probably about 7-years down the road.
So probably stuck with lab processing until then.
Bob G.
Re: E-6 to C-41: A Transition
Have you considered mailing your E-6 exposures to a reputable lab? I use AgX. Rumor has it, Fuji and Kodak will continue to provide chemistry for the next two years, and I imagine that the few remaining E-6 labs will stockpile a couple year's worth of chemistry. If you prefer E-6 emulsions your only obstacles for the next few years are: 1) dealing with the wait, and 2) dealing with the worry of loss in the mail. I've never had film lost or damaged in the mail, but it always makes me a little nervous. Using the USPS, round trip postage is about $12 for a one-week turnaround, Seattle to Sault Ste Marie.