http://www.vangargoyle.com/post/img459_edited-2.jpg
http://www.vangargoyle.com/post/img460_edited-3.jpg
http://www.vangargoyle.com/post/img465_edited-2.jpg
Printable View
No. And neither are my 2x3 Graphics and 2x3 Cambo.
By local standards, all are medium format.
It is unfortunate as I think all people who shoot with View Cameras have a lot to offer.
If it has bellows and movements we tend to let it slide.
I thought the 6x9 Horseman did qualify because it is a camera with all the movements
My personal belief is that Large starts at 6x12 (which is a slightly cropped 4"x5" frame) 6x17 covers as much surface area as 4x5, and is as wide as 5x7..
6x9 is medium format, but as Edward said, anyone shooting a view camera has alot to offer on this forum, do not let the fact that you shoot medium format deter you from contributing.
Not enough area, though. There was a bellows for some 35mm or other that had all the movements, did that make 35mm large format? The oldtime definition was anything smaller than 4x5 was medium format.:)Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Walker
Who cares? They are just things that make pictures.
So are cellphone cameras.Quote:
Originally Posted by sully75
Well, the mods may take down his pictures. There's a "safe haven for small formats" thread in the lounge though.
If it's any consolation, every photo I have posted before this was shot on 4x5, so it's not like I'm trying to sneak in. :-)