3 pages and no one commented on the Sinar 8x10 in the video.
Strange. This is still the LF forum, isn't it?
Printable View
3 pages and no one commented on the Sinar 8x10 in the video.
Strange. This is still the LF forum, isn't it?
OK, he's got a Sinar 8x10. Should we also play the "Guess That Lens!" game? He seems to have at least two of them.
Of course, he sort of makes a point of telling people that he never touches the camera! Is that permitted to say in this thread? :)
--Darin
Schneider 210mm xl and a Schneider symmar 300mm. Now he shoots with a P3 and a phase one back. He no longer does this "beneath the roses" dreck. For a peek at his latest efforts to make less "stagey" pictures - http://www.gagosian.com/exhibitions/...egory-crewdson. But don't pay too much attention to the images and make sure to check out the video because, afterall, don't forget he's a "process" artist.
Clicking the shutter and making sure you have closed the aperture closed before you pull out the dark slide is really not what making a good picture is about. I don't prefer his work, but I don't ding him for delegating the mechanical bits on sets as big as his.
Looks like an APO Symmar 300/360(Pic #1) and a 240mm APO-Symmar(pic #2) to me, the 210mm XL has a front element almost as large as a Copal 3 shutter ;)
I am not a fan of Crewdson. Like they say the opposite of love isn't hate it is indifference, but I won't get into why I feel that way here. I will watch the movie at some point only because it exists. I would be surprised if I come away with a different opinion of him after I see it.
I am much more interested in seeing the new movie on Duane Michals. He has an extraordinary mind which comes across as a little crazy, but if you have ever met the man you will know he is not.
I'd also like to know more about the Duane Michals film.