PDA

View Full Version : The King who loved Photography



cyrus
6-Jun-2007, 11:17
International Herald Tribune, June 1, 2007 p22
A rare glimpse of 19th-century Iran
Byline: Nazila Fathi

TEHRAN (http://www.flickr.com/photos/iranpx/21446728/) -- When Shadi Ghadirian (http://www.zonezero.com/EXPOSICIONES/fotografos/ghadirian/index.html) was 21, she got a student job printing old photographs at the small photography museum (http://www.flickr.com/photos/iranpx/21446728/) here. She was so drawn by the 19th-century pictures of women with thick black eyebrows wearing head scarves and short skirts over baggy pants that two years later, in 2000, she began incorporating the imagery into her own photography.

Using clothes from the late 1800s, she dressed female friends and posed them in front of painted backdrops to look like the women in the antique photos (http://www.kargah.com/history_of_iranian_photography/qajarwomen/index.php?action=show&picid=1953). But her women appeared with something modern: a newspaper, a tape recorder, a vacuum cleaner.

The shots became known as the Qajar (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qajar_dynasty) series and made her one of Iran's most famous female photographers (http://www.fanoosphoto.com/).

"My pictures became a mirror reflecting how I felt: We are stuck between tradition and modernity," she said in an interview here.

Ghadirian's mentor was Bahman Jalali (http://www.kargah.com/jalali/), a veteran photographer and the former director of the museum, who was also inspired by photographs of women from the 19th century (http://www.kargah.com/history_of_iranian_photography/qajarwomen/index.php?action=show&picid=1953). In his work, Jalali combined the faces of women from that era with harsh, angry red lines that were painted in protest over the walls of an old photo shop in the city of Isfahan in the early days of the 1979 revolution, and printed them on mirrors.

Both artists are among the very few people who have been exposed to the country's rich collection of old photographs (http://www.kargah.com/history_of_iranian_photography/early/index.php?other=1)- some 48,000 that are kept in Golestan Palace (http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=Golestan+Palace), a former royal home and now a museum. Only researchers and publishers are allowed to view the collection. About 50 of the photos, in poor-quality prints, are displayed in a basement.

The collection of 19th-century photos is particularly extraordinary because at the time Islam was interpreted as banning photographs of people's faces. The pictures exist because one person fell in love with photography: the country's most powerful man, the king.

He was Nasir al-Din Shah (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Nasseraldinshah3.jpg.png), who ruled Iran from 1848 to 1896 and was first exposed to a camera in 1844, at 13. He became so fascinated by photography that in 1858 he invited a French photographer, Frances Carlhian, to set up the first official studio at his palace.

"We were lucky that the king fell in love with photography," Jalali said, "because it was the king who started taking pictures. The Islamic clerics could not oppose him."

Photos were taken of the royal family, including some of the king's 90 wives and children. The king also initiated documentary photography, requiring that his trips be photographed and sending photographers to take pictures of war and historical sites around the country. He obliged his provincial governors to send him photographs along with their reports.

"Iran is the only Muslim country in the Middle East where photography developed in a natural environment," said Mohammad Reza Tahmasebpour (http://www.kargah.com/history_of_iranian_photography/early/index.php?other=1), a photographer and researcher on the topic. "Because it was supported by the state, different branches of photography flourished."

The pictures, carefully pasted in satin albums, are now kept in an earthquake-resistant and bulletproof room at Golestan Palace....

George Kara
6-Jun-2007, 17:32
Thank you very much for sharing. Its incredible that the king shot a photo of a bare breasted woman. From looking at these images it appears that present day Islam is less tolerant than it was 150 years ago.

The Persians are of aryan descent and historically seem to have a very close kinship with the west. Perhaps this King had alot to do with it. Really wonderful historical shots.

Jorge Gasteazoro
6-Jun-2007, 17:37
Great post!

tim atherton
6-Jun-2007, 17:48
Neat story

Mind you, it knocks the old romantic notions of Persian beauties into touch - what with the King's penchant for all those beetle browed, rather hefty moustachioed women....

cyrus
6-Jun-2007, 18:05
Neat story

Mind you, it knocks the old romantic notions of Persian beauties into touch - what with the King's penchant for all those beetle browed, rather hefty moustachioed women....

LoL! I guess the King didn't have good looking relatives.

That reminds me of my grandfather's collection of French postcards (which I still have) that somehow came into his possession when he was training to be a fighter pilot there in the '30s - by today's standards, the women were quite... er...fat.

In Iran, being "moonfaced" was considered a sign of beauty about 150 years ago - as was sporting a uni-brow.

Things have changed (http://www.irantravelingcenter.com/irantravelingcenter/iran_girl.jpg) (thank God!)

Eric James
6-Jun-2007, 18:28
In Iran, being "moonfaced" was considered a sign of beauty about 100 years ago - as was sporting a uni-brow.

Come on over to the Anchorage Walmart - we've got some real babes by those standards; their only rivals are found at the Anchorage Costco water buffalo feeding station. Rubenesque, meet balloonesque.

Seriously though, thanks for the post and enlightenment/education...now back to Shandi's website.

George Kara
6-Jun-2007, 18:51
OK I wasnt going to say it, but did you notice the photo of the king with his harem? I could swear the center woman looks just like Curly from the three stooges. Actually the one just to the left of Curly looks alot like Moe.

I had never heard before of the 19th century Persian influence on Larry, Moe and Curly. Who ever said Vaudeville was low-brow.

jnantz
6-Jun-2007, 19:03
being thin was a sign that you were not well fed (poor) in those days,
just as in some places, having skin tone (tan) showed that you were a laborer,
not of the upper class ...

great article,
thanks for the links!

cyrus
6-Jun-2007, 19:11
being thin was a sign that you were not well fed (poor) in those days,
just as in some places, having skin tone (tan) showed that you were a laborer,
not of the upper class ...

great article,
thanks for the links!


And the fashion magazines hadn't yet convinced us all that attractive = infantilized waifs.

Interestingly, Persian eyes (http://www.trekearth.com/gallery/Middle_East/Iran/photo285388.htm) don't seem to change (http://www.renaissanceastrology.com/images/lovpers.jpg)though, even these (http://mlah.us/images/blog/060115D.jpg)ones! they're a dead giveaway.

cyrus
6-Jun-2007, 19:20
If you like these, check out the portraits by Antoin Sevrugiun (http://www.geocities.com/sevruguin/) which is sold in his book on Amazon (http://www.amazon.com/Sevruguin-Persian-Image-Photographs-Unnumbered/dp/0295978457) as well as in various collections (http://www.asia.si.edu/archives/finding_aids/sevruguin.html) in the US.

http://www.iranian.com/Arts/2007/January/Sevruguin/Images/10.jpg

tim atherton
6-Jun-2007, 19:33
being thin was a sign that you were not well fed (poor) in those days,
just as in some places, having skin tone (tan) showed that you were a laborer,
not of the upper class ...

great article,
thanks for the links!

and the monobrow and moustache...?

cyrus
6-Jun-2007, 19:46
Come on over to the Anchorage Walmart - we've got some real babes by those standards; their only rivals are found at the Anchorage Costco water buffalo feeding station. Rubenesque, meet balloonesque.

Seriously though, thanks for the post and enlightenment/education...now back to Shandi's website.

Well if you want Iranian hotties try Sara Shahi (http://users.sedona.net/~sepa/sara-shahi.html) or perhaps CNN anchor Rudi Bakhtiar (http://www.rapidteens.com/gfx/051005/rudi-bakhtiar.jpg) (I always had a thing for her - not that I would get anywhere!)

Now what do you suppose they would have looked like 150 years ago? LOL!

paulr
6-Jun-2007, 19:46
I'm happy to say that the contemporary Iranian women I've met look little like the king's harem and cousins. At first glance I thought they were Turkish men!

Really interesting story and cool pictures.

and Tim, maybe we'll discover that the monobrow and moustache were badges of royalty, and that women who were not so regally endowed had them added.

tim atherton
6-Jun-2007, 20:05
I guess it's cool if you are Trotsky and into the Frida Kahlo thing.... :)

Greg Lockrey
6-Jun-2007, 20:35
I guess it's cool if you are Trotsky and into the Frida Kahlo thing.... :)

:D :D :D

Duane Polcou
9-Jun-2007, 23:48
"Good God, most people really are not good looking"
- My long deceased friend, Jay Fankauser, to me, in 1985, as we sat on a bench on the boardwalk at Wildwood, NJ for over an hour to check out good looking girls only to not see a single one.

"I'm going to save up for some pro lights and start to shoot models."
-My reply

kjsphotography
10-Jun-2007, 19:48
Beauty comes from within not what is on the outside...

cyrus
10-Jun-2007, 22:09
More Iranian photographers (http://www.kargah.com/names.php?catid=5), if you're interested (contemporary stuff)

Aside from the looks of the women, it is interesting that photography seems to have arrived in Iran less than 5 years after it became accepted in Europe.