Patrick Thrush
6-May-2005, 07:50
A short time ago, I posted a question regarding mount difficulties for the older, non-A series Nikkor EL 150mm lens with the 53mm mount. Right now, there seems to be a slump in the prices for both the old and new type used Nikkors, so I have picked up a cherry newer lens with the 39mm mount.
I note several differences between the two. The newer lens has a 39mm front front and a 33mm rear element. The older one is 36mm X 38mm, respectively. My work right now is strictly b/w, and I use a condensor, variable diffusion colorhead, and coldlight depending upon the vision that I have for paper selection and final print. A quick test has shown no real difference between these lenses with a fixed contrast paper. I cannot speak yet to larger print sizes such as 11x14" and 16x20". What about edge performance and falloff?
Color may be another story, and it will be some time before I dabble in that. Does anyone have any opinion about the differences in performance between these two lenses? Why was the design of the elements changed, and to what benefit?
I note several differences between the two. The newer lens has a 39mm front front and a 33mm rear element. The older one is 36mm X 38mm, respectively. My work right now is strictly b/w, and I use a condensor, variable diffusion colorhead, and coldlight depending upon the vision that I have for paper selection and final print. A quick test has shown no real difference between these lenses with a fixed contrast paper. I cannot speak yet to larger print sizes such as 11x14" and 16x20". What about edge performance and falloff?
Color may be another story, and it will be some time before I dabble in that. Does anyone have any opinion about the differences in performance between these two lenses? Why was the design of the elements changed, and to what benefit?